« Shipper - Carrier Rate Negotiation Strategies for 2007 | Main | The Fuel Surcharge Dilemma »

Shipper - Carrier Collaboration, a Myth or Reality?

“Collaboration” was probably the most frequently heard buzzword during the “Transportation” tracks at the 2006 CSCMP Annual Meeting in San Antonio late last year. Collaboration in a transportation context can take many forms. You can have shipper – carrier collaboration when a company shares its shipping forecast with its core carriers to ensure it has adequate capacity or when a manufacturer and its core carriers work together to modify operating practices that result in excessive waiting time. A shipper can collaborate with other shippers in similar or different industries, or even competitors, to share truck capacity or to create round trips and continuous moves.

Collaboration in a business context is similar to collaboration in a personal context. To make a marriage work, there needs to be trust, good communication, patience and flexibility. What value should a shipper place on collaboration in the face of the significant increase in freight rates over the past few years? How can a shipper maintain its loyalty to its core carriers when it has an opportunity to secure lower freight rates from other carriers?

Similarly, what should a carrier do when it has an opportunity to provide its most valuable resource, its trucks and drivers, to another shipper that provides a higher yielding freight rate? How many carriers come to a shipper and say, we have an opportunity to achieve a higher yield by reducing our allocation of trucks to your company and making them available to another higher yielding client?

Is it reasonable to expect a carrier to share its specific operating ratio for each client with that client? In most cases, the answer is NO. This may work with unprofitable customers but every carrier knows that it is opening a “can of worms” if it reveals how much money it is making from its profitable accounts. Since shippers are seeking rate stability, a competitive cost structure and capacity and since carriers are seeking the maximum yield for its transportation services, does this make trust, open communication and information sharing, the key elements of collaboration, a myth rather than reality?

The writer would argue the opposite. Shippers need to share as much data as possible with their carriers concerning their freight characteristics, volumes, lanes, delivery requirements and their freight rates. Sharing this information with your existing and prospective core carriers is crucial since there is no point trying to establish a collaborative relationship with companies with whom your freight characteristics are not a fit. Similarly, it is essential that carriers share their strengths in terms of head haul and back haul requirements, capacity, service levels etc. so there is a happy marriage with their customers and minimal disappointments down the road. As situations change (e.g. new customers are added, the carrier’s head haul and back haul requirements become different), it is important to share this information with each other to sustain the relationship. Data from a recent study suggests that shippers that do work in a collaborative rather than adversarial role with their carriers tend to spend less on freight as a percent of revenue. Collaboration is a challenge but it is in the best interests of both shippers and carriers.

Dan Goodwill
President
Dan Goodwill & Associates Inc.
www.dantranscon.com


Comments (3)

Dear Dan, welcome to the blogosphere! There are too few good logistics related blogs!

This was a good post, but I also think that there is a point to be made about having a sales team that knows how to do good discovery. Too often sales and other operational folks involved in pre-sales activities rarely do a good enough job determining fit before engaging in a relationship with customers.

Few transportation sales people know how to defend a tariff rate by looking at the whole supply chain for savings. Customers tend to think in terms of "eaches" relative to the movement of their products from origin to destination. If all a sales professional talks about is his own little slice of the chain, then customers by my experience, will attempt to get all their projected savings from that single slice, simply because thats all the sales person controls.

A wider look, even at the initial point of engagement can help in determining if longer term potential exists with prospective clients.

Eric

David Faoro:

Welcome Dan to the world of "blogging"!

I also attended the San Antonio conference and agree collaboration was the primary theme.

I am in general agreement with your comments until it comes to working with rail carriers. Never in my 20+ years of working in Logistics and Supply Chain have I encountered such arrogant and insenstive attitudes as I have with the rail carriers in today's environment.

I can provide all the information I want, yet the results do not change. The railway industry are only interested in driving bottom line profits at any expense.

I have adopted some other strategies which perhaps could be the topic for another posting, however my point is that collaboration needs two willing partners.

In all other areas, I have had many successful results from a collaborative approach. This includes both with carriers and with my customers.

Keep up the great work Dan.

Dave

Sanjay Khanna:

Dan,

A great topic to start the blog;

I share your sentiments on the benefits of collaboration.

Collaboration between two organizations, in our case between the shipping customer and service provider when conducted in the spirit of mutual benefit has the potential to forge long term business partnerships rather than transactional relationships.

Open and ongoing dialogue between the stakeholders that addresses their concerns results in an acceptable and beneficial solution for both parties.

There are many positive examples (i.e., interline and linehaul relationships between the various transportation providers) in our industry that serve as witness to the benefits of a positive collaborative relationship.


Post a comment

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on April 11, 2007 2:44 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Shipper - Carrier Rate Negotiation Strategies for 2007.

The next post in this blog is The Fuel Surcharge Dilemma.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by Movable Type 3.34
Hosted by LivingDot